Dictatorship: At a time where he was not allowed to question, it was questioned! Democratic state of Right conducted for the Great Letter: Who before questioned today assents in the arrest of who questions! Would not be this a incoherence? Perhaps, to if becoming p.m. the individual left of being Brazilian citizen who votes, paid taxes, carrier of rights, duties and obligations? I think that not! If in a movement of protest a manifestant either leader or led it, Police Military man or civilian, commands, practises or stirs up to torts I until understands that a time proven the fact, imprisoned it either! must! Not in penitentiaries as Bang 1. He is obvious! What it is questioned here is the fact to arrest somebody for the simple fact to question, to disclose itself. This yes is a incoherence! If to be to militate is to be private of the right to reveal opinion and to protest, then, it must be deduced that to be to militate it is to live under the regimen of the dictatorship! But, valley to remember, that we live in a Democratic State of Right, where the p.m. as well as all too much Brazilian citizens, have rights, duties and obligations! He says our Great Letter that ALL the Brazilian citizens have the right to congregate themselves to disclose pacifically, also, the right to the liberty of speech and of this I oppose to open hand! Perhaps they are made use to isentarem Policias Military and Firemen of the payment of taxes in Brazil? Of this I am certain that not! Obviously, so that any movement of protest has legitimacy it needs to be total supported for the article 5, interpolated proposition XVI of our Federal Constitution! On the other hand, it will be fact that the Federal Constitution of 1988 not in the ones of the right to the pacific manifestations and the liberty of speech, then, is clearly that our Great Letter if contradicts when imposes the Police women and paying Military Firemen of taxes, a regimen of dictatorship! is contradiction exactly why we live in a Country of Democratic State of Right! In its blog ' ' The art of pensar' ' Nigel Warburton, says: ' ' Some people argue that the breaking of the law never if can justify: if we are not satisfied with the law, we must try to change it through the legal steps, as the campaigns, the writing of letters, etc. .